John Ingleby – Chair, Transition in Kings
My wife and I went to see the film “Tomorrow” by Cyril Dion and Mélanie Laurent, and then four days later we saw “The Age of Consequences” by Jared P Scott. Both films are about climate change, but they couldn’t be more different.
“The Age of Consequences” is one of several films about climate change, including Al Gore’s “An Inconvenient Truth” and others, such as “Years of Living Dangerously” by James Cameron. These films are all well made and lavishly presented, with the theme best described as “Stark Warnings to Humanity”. They graphically illustrate how, if we don’t change our ways, our planet Earth is becoming more dangerous and less habitable.
My problem with “The Age of Consequences” and similar doom-laden films is that they don’t give any clues about what we could possibly do to avert disaster. After watching pictures of devastation from droughts, storms, melting ice, warming oceans, mass migrations and so-on, the cynic in me begins to notice how parts of the film are actually computer special effects. Small wonder that so many are persuaded this whole issue is a carefully choreographed “hoax”.
So I want to explain why “Tomorrow” is so different from many other films dealing with climate change. To begin with, “Tomorrow” was crowd-funded from the inspiration of Cyril Dion and Mélanie Laurent when their first child was born. Where could they find real-life examples of people and communities today, who are creating practical solutions for a more sustainable, equitable and just way of life?
“Tomorrow” was produced in France, and first shown to wide acclaim at the Paris Conference in December 2015. It took just over a year to add English sub-titles, and the Transition Network (based in Totnes) is arranging UK screenings for a minimal charge of £100 per event. Most of these are being organised by local Transition groups, and shown to small audiences in town and village halls.
The story of Cyril and Mélanie’s journey is different because climate change is rarely mentioned. Instead, their story illustrates the human activities which produce climate change alongside alternative approaches, to show how destruction caused by those activities can be avoided, and even reversed.
Did you know, for example, that while small-scale farming obviously involves much human effort, each acre produces on average five times more food compared with today’s large industrialised farms? Moreover, small-scale farming is better at preserving soil structures and absorbing rain and nutrients. How did we come to accept industrialised agriculture as the natural and inevitable way to produce food, with its demands for ever-growing inputs of water, fertilisers and energy?
The term “permaculture”, meaning permanent (i.e. sustainable) agriculture, describes modern approaches derived from the study of age-old methods of food production. Cyril and Mélanie’s journey shows how permaculture methods are being used to grow food in today’s urban environments.
“Tomorrow” is a positive, affirming and inspirational film, exploring creative solutions in the fields of food, energy, transport, economics and education. In their travels to many different parts of the world, the couple visit permaculture farms, urban agriculture projects, community-owned renewable-energy schemes, local currencies, creative schools, and an ambitious recycling project.
If you search YouTube for “#Tomorrowfilm“, you will see how this film leaves people with a more optimistic and positive outlook for their future. It is opening eyes to new possibilities for our own communities.
Future screenings of “Tomorrow” can be found by Googling “Tomorrow Transition” followed by the town name below. So far, I only know about these dates and places:
Tulse Hill – May 2nd; Wembley – May 5th; Letchworth – June 20th; Brighton – June 21st